ANALISIS FRAMING PEMBERITAAN GANJAR PRANOWO DALAM KASUS KORUPSI E-KTP (TRIBUN NEWS, JAWAPOS, DAN SUARA MERDEKA PERIODE AGUSTUS-NOVEMBER 2015 DAN MARET 2017)

Abstract

The study departs from the understanding that the media reported the same events differently. The differences was due to the incident differently conceived and constructed by the media. While the purpose of this study was to determine the frame created every local media online by Tribunnews, Jawapos and Suara Merdeka with the Ganjar Pranowo’s realease in E-KTP before and after corruption case researched. The total source of this research are 36 news of each 12 news inthree medias: before theE-KTP case in August to November 2015 and after the E-KTP case in March 2017. The methods used of this research is the analysisofframing, used toseehowthemassages orevents areconstructed bythe media and presented to the audience, by developing analytical framing of Zhongdang Pan and Gerald M. Kosicki (2007). This model devides theframing in fourmajorstructures,theyaresyntactic,script,thematic,andrhetorical. The results of this study indicate that the news in Tribunnes, Jawa Pos, and Suara Merdeka in the incident leading to the same goal which is to compare Ganjar Pranowo’s release before and after E-KTP corruption case. The result of framing analysis on Tribunnews that have change of attitude from take side to the blaming Ganjar Pranowo as E-KTP corruption case. It’s highlited on the selection of news sources. In contrast with Jawa Pos, it show that have take sides (in another word “pro”) and It’s highlited on the selection of vocabulary to the positive attitude. The results of framing analysis from Suara Merdeka on Ganjar news that there is no change in attitude found. Suara Merdeka is very neutral and impartial to anyone, but have the sensationalism in the news Ganjar Pranowo. Sensationalism can be measured on the emotional aspect (likes, hates, sad, happy, disappointed, tired,etc.)