APLIKASI MANAJEMEN RESIKO DARI PERSEPSI PARA STAKEHOLDERS (STUDI KASUS PROYEK PEMBANGUNAN JALAN TOL SEMARANG-SOLO SEKSI I RUAS TEMBALANG-GEDAWANG)

Abstract

ABSTRACT Risk of construction are borned by many parties in a project. Generally, risks are identified just from the owner and contractor, some other sides are also involved in that project. The aim of this research is to analyse the application of risk management in the highway project from stakeholders’ perception. the objective of this research is to analyse the risks of Semarang-Solo highway project section I (Tembalang-Gedawang) from the stakeholders’ perception in the project, such as contractor, owner, planner consultant, supervisory consultant, and society around this project. The second objective is to know the comprehensive risk management from stakeholders’ perception. The third objective is to compare risk analysis method among Risk Breakdown Structure (RBS) method and Analythical Hierarchy Process (AHP). The fourth objective is to analyse the sensitivity of risk to the change of policy of each stakeholder. Primary data were taken through the interviews, then processed using RBS and AHP method. RBS risk analysis was done by multiplying the value of the impact and frequency to obtain the value of the risk level of each risk factor. AHP risk analysis was done by calculating eigen values and consistency test to get value of risk probability and risk impact, then multiplied them to get the value of risk level. Risk analysis is conducted to all stakeholders, to obtain the comprehensive risk analysis at this project. This risk analysis can be taken to the risk sensitivity analysis to know risk sensitivity at this project from the change of policy by each stakeholder. This research found that the risk of Semarang-Solo highway project section I (Tembalang- Gedawang) are different in each stakeholders’ perception. The result of risk analysis with RBS and AHP method at each stakeholder is also different. Those differences are also seen at the difference of risk ranking, because the instruments of questionnaires at RBS methode are easier for respondents than the instruments of questionnaires at AHP method. From the whole risk of the project, the biggest risk from all stakeholders by RBS method is construction risk, but the biggest risk from AHP method is economic risk. The results of risk sensitivity analysis show that the contractor risk is sensitive when it changed from 0,48 to 0,10 and 0,70. Supervisory consultant risk is sensitive when it changed from 0,19 to 1,20 but the planner consultant risk is sensitive when it changed from 0,11 to 0,40. The risk of both society and owner are not sensitive with any change. This concludes that the risk ranking of both stakeholders are consistent. Keywords: construction risk, project stakeholders, Risk Breakdown Structure, Analythical Hierarchy Process, risk sensitivity analysis