PERBEDAAN IDEOLOGIS DALAM PEMBINGKAIAN BERITA (Studi Kasus Pemberitaan Pascaledakan Bom Ledakan Bom Bali oleh TIME dan GATRA)

Abstract

Nurhayati.2005. ”Ideological Deferences in News Framing”. Kajian Sastra I (29): 136-152. This paper tries to apply one of the Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) approaches in analyzing two political texts of the same topic, that is a discourse after Bali bombings, from two different media, TIME and Gatra. The approach used is framing analysis. The result of the analysis shows that were two different narratives built by media, several days after Bali bombings. The narrative’s topic is the arrest of Abu Bakar Ba’asyir as Megawati’s taking action in combating terrorism. TIME constructs a narratives that the arresting is reasonable because Abu Bakar is the founding father of Jemaah Islamiah, one of the terrosists in the world according to US. On the countrary, GATRA claims that the arresting represents Megawati’s position under US’ pressures. The analysis discovers that the two narratives represent two different ideologies. TIME’s ideology is anti Islamic Radical, where as GATRA’s ideology is anti US’s pressures. The ideological struggle ca be discovered implicity in the two texts.