PENGARUH METODE EVALUASI PENAWARAN PENGADAAN BARANG/JASA PEMERINTAH TERHADAP HASIL PEKERJAAN DENGAN PENDEKATAN ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS ( Studi Kasus di Pemerintah Kabupaten Temanggung )

Abstract

The government procurement of goods and services is expected to be effective and efficient and meet the principles of healthy competition, transparency, openness, and fairness for all parties involved. By implementing scoring system it is hoped that the principles will be realized in the government goods/services procurement. The set of problems in this research is the minimum use of Scoring System (Scrutinizing List and Passing Grade) in the Goods/Services bid. This leads to the many findings of less-than-minimum-score projects in Temanggung Regency by the Auditing Team. The object being researched is the goods and services auction of budget ceiling below five billion rupiahs. The objectives of the research are: 1) to analyze the difference between elimination system and scoring system in a bid evaluation, 2) to determine the factor most dominantly affecting passing grade and scrutinizing list within the process of choosing the winner for the contracting work, using AHP method, 3) to validate the analysis result with the help of the stakeholders of the goods/services procurement in Temanggung Regency. The methods used are qualitative and quantitative. The qualitative method is used to relatively measure the factors affecting passing grade and the scrutinizing list from the primary data. On the other hand, the quantitative method is used to analyze the secondary data and the bid documents. The combination of the two methods is used to validate the research result. The result shows that the elimination and scoring systems are different in terms of time, cost evaluation, evaluation result, detail of qualifications, accuracy in choosing the service provider, result of contract work, participants selection, process of determining the winner of the contract work, number of case found by auditors, basic guidelines in conducting the project, opinions of the service providers, opinions of the budget user, opinions of the project leader, and opinions of the contract work committee about the two systems, and evaluation limitations. Factors obtaining the lowest average of likert scale (2) are detail of qualification, accuracy in choosing the service provider, number of case found by auditors, opinions of the service providers, opinions of the budget users, opinions of the project leader, and opinions of the contract work committee about the two systems, and evaluation limitations. One factor has the highest average of likert scale (4), that is evaluation cost. Secondly, the research result shows that the most dominant factor affecting passing grade is the financial one (55,1%). The data validation tells that the scoring system stresses the importance on the company‟s financial strength, experience, the number of minimum expert personnel employed and the number of minimum work tools owned by the goods/service providers. This research concludes that 1) the characteristic difference between elimination system and scoring system is that scoring system proves to give better impact towards the bidding process and the contract working, 2) the dominant factors affecting passing grade and scrutinizing list are finance (55,1%), technical (18,4%), administrative (6,7%), interest statement (6,7%), pact of integrity (6,5%), and qualification (6,7%). Data validation shows that there are still abuses on the contract work. The research suggestions are 1) the application of scoring system requires further validation on what is written on the document and what are found in real possession of the company attending the contract bid, 2) the company‟s experience in conducting contract work, not merely administrative matters, should also be considered as an important factor in determining the winner of the contract work, 3) the theses succeeding this one should focus on the application of bid evaluation method using Built Operator Transfer System (BOT).