ANALISIS KESALAHAN GRAMATIKA PADA KETRAMPILAN MENULIS MAHASISWA JURUSAN SASTRA INGGRIS FAKULTAS SASTRA UNDIP

Abstract

The aim of this research is to =ayes the graneestioal adlitane made bY donate of the English Department, the Esaulty of lettere. DM in laglimb Writing. To reach the aim, Tae research ten took 40 samples randomly (roughly 20%) from the 00•90altions written by students taking Writing I. Writing II, Writing III and Writing W. tests (10 aemplea free etch level). Another note-elope nod In oolnoting the data nu tiantionsaire whist eantaned question about the reasons for asking geematioal mistaken, the difficulties the en¬dtatt failtderins English mass, end affeotin teohniquee of teaohing gunner. The grennatleal mistakes frequently found in Writing IT were devided in to mow categories. Next, the siertekee were examined to an whether the min. tens in Writing I also enured in Writing LI, Writing III and Writing IV. Then the remain tea tried to analyse the passible reasons for the mistakes referring to the theory of tanning a fOreign language am to the answers to the questionnaire. The results shaft that elven an the mistakes belonging to nab tuttegori on= in Writing I. Writing II, Writing III and Writing IV. Furthermore, the Peroentage of sates partimular types of mistakes filename. This is due to the fact that ease linguistic items have not been used in Writing I and Writing Additionally, the compositions ler-Writing III end. IV tend to-be linger nth more oomPlicated structures whin for eon respondent, have resulted in lore grammatical mistakes, Koerner. on the shale, the pereentsga of nob category of mistaken deereasee. This reeearoh will be continued to find son eltaraative toohniques of teaohing greaser effectively. Panelitian int bertuthan sanganalisis kesalablue gramatika yang dthuat oleh pare mousier. jenny Sastre. mart., PathItas Saatra 111:0IY dales rentals kae rangan dales babas. Irwin, Mitt* menospai Wean Stu, tin genellti nenanbil repel samara soak dari baring= smart. ujian Writing I, Writing II, Writing III dan Writing IV, m¬aize naming 10 Waring= (20%). Jadi ads 40 avenge= yang gianalisim lomaLthan grazatikezwa. Telma yengenpulan data yang lath Mask knesloner yang Perini partanymas thatang salsa aebeb kesalaban granatika yang act bat, bumlit= kesulitan rang Derek. hadapi arta teknik pangajaran grammar (tate. Palma) yang ward nabssisva breleanfeat. Selanjutnya kers/Saban kasalahan granatika yang Ma rads Writing IT Melon yokkan manjadi beberapa gentdian keselaban kasalahan tenant diteliti, stabil, tended= pada motiap kategari pads Writing I meth tarjadi pads Writing II, III, den IV. thteleh Stu tin peneliti menoari sabab sash kesslahan Length range= pads Semi pembelajaren Bahasa lining earth pada basil latesioner. Bevil penelitian sammynkkan bakers bum* sews kaaalonsaa damn satiny ka¬tagori tazdapat pada Writing I, Writing II, Writing in den Writing IT. frOsen¬tan dart baberap yenta koealaban babbul senunjokten kamikaze Hal int terjadi karma bathyal* Pokok ?Fannin bob* diganakan Wen Writing I dan Writing II. sealn nu jugs karene karangan karangan think Writing III den IV rendering panyang dengan etruktur yang lebib remit yang teartonya nandorong tinbalars labih banya/c thaalahan. Henan. nest garis baser, probation* dari Janis Janis Walsh= yang ditaliti nitaan yenontan. Penelitian fat ink= dilanjutkea ant& menemri beberaga alteznatlf teknik aengayar grammar (tate Pallas.) yang efettif.