MODEL PEMANFAATAN PULAU SERANGAN DI KOTA DENPASAR PASCA REKLAMASI

Abstract

ABSTRACT Bali is a national and international tourism destination, where Sanur, Kuta and Nusa Dua are the triangle zone of accommodation and tourism activities. Serangan Island is located in the middle of the triangle zone. This potentiality gives Serangan a new opportunity to become a new tourism zone and due to this purpose it must be prepared. Reclamation is another important thing to be done because this island has suffered from abrasion. PT. Bali Turtle Island Development (BITD) has started this project in 1996 but due to monetary crisis this project has stopped since..1997 Many local workers lost their jobs and combine with cultural and environmental issues, this has caused a social disturbance among the local people. Serangan perceived by the local as a holly ground and the project seemed to disobey its value, and there were rumors that the reclamation is the reason behind the abrasion. This dilemma has put local government in a hard position to make any decision and from then Serangan is abandoned. The question to be answer in this study is how Serangan can be modeled in order to be utilized in accordance with stakeholders' demands. The purpose of the study is to seek for the best utilization model for post-reclamation area of Serangan in order to be agreed by stakeholders. The objectives of the study are: (I) conduct a library research about undersized island utilization, (2) Men* the benefit and the weight of Serangan island as the base for the hierarchy in decision making process, (3) Conduct a primary study by distributing questioners to local government, private sector and local community, and (4) Zone modeling;Or Serangan utilization. The method of the study is analysis method. Analytic Hierarchy Method is employed to describe stakeholders' perception toward Serangan utilization and descriptive method is employed to assess zone modeling, using every elemen of activity in Serangan Island. Stakeholder perception analysis for zone modeling in Serangan Island shows a comparison between benefit and weights of alternative I (0.704), alternative II (0.948), and alternative III (1.464). Alternative 111 is the biggest of all and, therefore, the best option for Serangan utilization. The result is then translated into Serangan zone modeling. The conclusions of the study are: (1) Stakeholder demands to preserve mangrove forest area for local fishery resources (2) Stakeholder demands the conservation of religious sites as well as fisher resources, (3) Stakeholder agree to make use Serangan workforce by economical development, and (4) The study succeeds to build a zone modeling for optimal utilization of Serangan Island. Recommendation from the study are: (1) every element of the local society agree to allow the reclamation continuation (2) Local government should determine policy to avoid status quo in exploiting the area for the concern of local people, (3) Local government should issue arrange a new regulation to organize the matters connected with the Serangan Island and the BITD, (4) There should be a firm delineation for conservation, preservation and ccmmercial area at Serangan based on the zone modeling, and (5) There should be further study to examine the influence of the project toward the economic of Serangan after the project is finished